Hi
I've got a record set of about 150 rows that I'm presenting to the user to update. I'm using a Paging table to display the record set as it's a lot easier on the eye. However, when i make changes to page 1 and 2 (for example), the update is only applied to the active page (i.e I'm on page 2 and Complete, that pages changes are submitted, but page 1's changes are not).
Is this a limitation of paging tables, or is it more likely to be a problem with the bindings?
I've got a record set of about 150 rows that I'm presenting to the user to update. I'm using a Paging table to display the record set as it's a lot easier on the eye. However, when i make changes to page 1 and 2 (for example), the update is only applied to the active page (i.e I'm on page 2 and Complete, that pages changes are submitted, but page 1's changes are not).
Is this a limitation of paging tables, or is it more likely to be a problem with the bindings?
RE: Updates using a Paging table
The Paging Table control is designed for viewing pages of data, not for editing the rows of data. The data rows sent back to the server side rules for processing, will only be those currently visible when you press complete.
So, yes this is a current limitation.
You would have to manually implement paging and server side rules processing to manage the requirement you have specified, as each page of data would need to be submitted to the server to be processed and stored accordingly.
The following FAQ may give you some pointers:
http://www.hyfinity.com/node/52